The COVID19 SCAMdemic... FEMA Spent All Your Money On Illegals - Biden Spent All On Ukraine - Harris Ignores Hurricane - America LAST

[zrickety]

 

[zrickety]

 

[Subliminal]

 

[Unreal1]

"Walz and I are both gun owners, we’re not taking anyone’s guns away." - Democrat candidate
"Take the guns first, go through due process second." - Republican candidate

Crazy time we live in.

 

[Unreal1]

That was the biggest takeaway from the debate for me. That line may sway a lot of independents, and even a small percentage of republicans, to vote for Kamala.

 

[zrickety]

That was the biggest takeaway from the debate for me. That line may sway a lot of independents, and even a small percentage of republicans, to vote for Kamala.

The problem is that she says whatever you want to hear and then does the complete opposite. She lies. They are both full of hot air, but Trump gets results and DC hates him for it. I can't populate the videos here anymore, but you get the idea...

 

[Unreal1]

The problem is that she says whatever you want to hear and then does the complete opposite. She lies. They are both full of hot air, but Trump gets results and DC hates him for it. I can't populate the videos here anymore, but you get the idea...

View attachment 309932

View attachment 309930

View attachment 309931

View attachment 309934

View attachment 309935

View attachment 309929

View attachment 309925

View attachment 309923

View attachment 309922

View attachment 309924

Good point, I still need to look into her actual voting record on guns. Haven't had the chance to yet. At the moment, I know they both support red flag laws. It seems, based on what you provided, they both support broader confiscation. But, like you said, Trump would actually get results. So it's a choice between ineffective anti-gun candidate vs effective anti-gun candidate. Kind of a shit situation we're in, but this is what happens when people hyper-fixate on identity politics and culture instead of things that actually matter.

 

[zrickety]

 

[Unreal1]

Following their arrest, it was alleged that Humber and Allison promoted 'violence and terrorism' as 'necessary to ignite a race war and accelerate the collapse of the government and the rise of a white ethnostate.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ram-arrest-Dallas-Humber-Matthew-Allison.html

 

[uberdot]

Good point, I still need to look into her actual voting record on guns. Haven't had the chance to yet. At the moment, I know they both support red flag laws. It seems, based on what you provided, they both support broader confiscation. But, like you said, Trump would actually get results. So it's a choice between ineffective anti-gun candidate vs effective anti-gun candidate. Kind of a shit situation we're in, but this is what happens when people hyper-fixate on identity politics and culture instead of things that actually matter.

Her record is not good, even for a California politician. She said she plans on banning imports of AR15s, whatever that means in politician gunspeak, because we don't import them. It shows she's as versed on firearms about as well as 'Fully Semiautomatic' Biden. She also denied being defund the police, when she clearly supported the defund movement. She's also acting tough on border talk when she recently compared ICE to the KKK and clearly failed her task on keeping the cartels out. The news has retconned the fact that even they called her 'border czar' when all it takes is a couple minutes of searching to see she was in fact in charge of it. There's a massive recon campaign in the media to make her look moderate when she was even called 'the most progressive candidate' by said media.

I am a registered dem, and in 2020, she was wildly unpopular with dems up until Biden's final debate. How everyone I know suddenly has amnesia is appalling. (Too many booster shots I guess.) Also, I think most real world people are concerned with the economy, not abortion, war and identity politics. That stuff just lives on the internet. I for one am most sick of a $100 bill being the new $20 bill

 

[Unreal1]

One of the main things that tanked her candidacy was her record of mass incarceration, specifcally regarding non-violent offenders. Democrats didn't view her as progressive enough. Today, she's suddenly too progressive.

As California attorney general, she spent years subverting a 2011 Supreme Court ruling requiring the state to reduce its prison population. The overseeing judicial panel nearly found the state in contempt of court.

https://prospect.org/justice/how-kamala-harris-fought-to-keep-nonviolent-prisoners-locked-up/

As far as guns, I can't find any relevant legislation that she has ever voted on.

I'm concerned with the second amendment, first amendment, small government, and economy in that order. I'm also tired of identity politics. However, it's the Trump campaign that is playing into identity politics far more than Harris. Trump won't stop talking about her race and what she identifies as. I don't care what her race is or what culture she wants to identify with. Additionally, Trump is taking advice from Laura Loomer, whose every statement revolves around race. Marjorie, of all people, even recognizes that Trump's ties with such an overt racist is hurting his campaign. Generally speaking, race seems to be at the forefront for many (not all) Trump supporters. From insane white replacement conspiracies to crazy generalizations about legal black immigrants. I'm over it.

The economy will not be fixed through increased spending or tariffs (a tax that required subsidies to keep the farming industry afloat). Trump's lack of fiscal conservatism and anti-free-market policies are yet another reason he is not a true Republican.

Abortion is such a weird hill to die on, so I understand where you're coming from there, but the reality is most women are concerned about it and are pro-choice, unfortunately.

 

[uberdot]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...supports-mandatory-buyback-of-assault-weapons

She definitely holds some very anti 2A positions regardless of what she's now being cued on, in regards to legislation she's supported confiscation in CA for who the government deems mentally unstable

From The Hill, a partisan site for democrat readers:
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaig...s-extremely-liberal-and-the-numbers-prove-it/

In the 115th Congress (2017-2019), 48 Democrats served in the Senate and cast a sufficient number of votes for reliable analysis. Of those 48, Harris had the third-most liberal voting record, after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.).

In the 116th Congress (2019-2020), 45 Democrats served in the Senate and cast a sufficient number of votes for reliable analysis. Of those 45, Harris had the second-most liberal voting record after Warren.

Since the turn of the century, there have been 11 complete Congresses (107th through 117th), with only five months remaining in the 118th. During this period, there were 109 different Democrats who served in the Senate and cast a sufficient number of roll call votes for a reliable analysis of their ideological position.

Of these 109 Democrats, Harris has the second-most liberal voting record. This makes her slightly less liberal than Warren, but more liberal than all of the remaining 107 Democrats, and significantly more liberal than all but a handful.

Included among these 109 Democrats are President Biden, former President Barack Obama and 2016 presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. The record indicates Clinton is more liberal than 74, Obama more liberal than 62 and Biden’s more liberal than 52.

Most of the Trump supporters I know are latino. Maybe it's where I live but the most race obsessed are the white Biden/Harris supporters. They act like they own anyone 'of colors' vote and must be their stewards who know better. All their feminist and social movements are really just hatred of themselves and white men (daddy issues). You can see it in the gaping blindspots in their pseudo-religious dogma

The most egregious identity politics from her that I've seen is how she has pushed "Equity", i.e. equality of outcome, in the form of social reparations or punishments based on peoples' fundamentals. For example, my kid's school dropped his gifted program because they're seen as racist/discriminatory by the current government. She supports that kind of praxis. She also does like to use a variety of race cards to enrich her position when it sees fit. The latter is the least thing that bothers me about her. I just see it as infantile. I do struggle to see how the same handlers that managed Biden aren't the same ones that have been handling Harris and will continue to do so

 

[zrickety]

The news has retconned the fact that even they called her 'border czar' when all it takes is a couple minutes of searching to see she was in fact in charge of it. There's a massive recon campaign in the media to make her look moderate when she was even called 'the most progressive candidate' by said media.

How everyone I know suddenly has amnesia is appalling. (Too many booster shots I guess.) I for one am most sick of a $100 bill being the new $20 bill

Well said.

 

[zrickety]

 

[Unreal1]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...supports-mandatory-buyback-of-assault-weapons

She definitely holds some very anti 2A positions regardless of what she's now being cued on, in regards to legislation she's supported confiscation in CA for who the government deems mentally unstable

Same as Trump, so the 2A issue is a wash.

Rittenhouse gets it:

So why did Trump fail to gain Rittenhouse's support? "Unfortunately, Donald Trump had bad advisers making him bad on the Second Amendment, and that is my issue," he said in his video. "If you cannot be completely uncompromisable on the Second Amendment, I will not vote for you." Trump's record includes a bump stock ban, which Reason's Jacob Sullum noted turned "peaceful gun owners into felons by fiat," and his support for red flag laws. Those moves may not be deal-breakers for many people, including other staunch supporters of the Second Amendment. They apparently are for Rittenhouse. It's his one vote, and he can do with it what he wants.

https://reason.com/2024/08/02/nobody-owes-trump-their-vote-not-even-kyle-rittenhouse/

I'm aware he eventually backed down due to the hate and death threats he received from supposed champions of free speech. However, the facts he brought up regarding Trump's record still stand. Trump does support red flag laws which allow liberal judges to confiscate guns from anyone they personally deem mentally unstable or unfit.

Worse, he wants to sneak gun control into one of the issues his supporters care most about, immigration:

On Monday morning, Trump tweeted that he would be willing to support more restrictions on gun ownership—and suggested linking those restrictions to congressional action on immigration.

https://reason.com/2019/08/05/trump...un-control-legislation-to-immigration-reform/

So basically, we have to give up guns to secure the border under Trump.

The party's neglect of the issue is consistent with its domination by Donald Trump, who pays lip service to the Second Amendment but has never been a true believer.

https://reason.com/2024/07/10/the-2...-a-passing-reference-to-the-second-amendment/

The most egregious identity politics from her that I've seen is how she has pushed "Equity", i.e. equality of outcome, in the form of social reparations or punishments based on peoples' fundamentals. For example, my kid's school dropped his gifted program because they're seen as racist/discriminatory by the current government. She supports that kind of praxis. She also does like to use a variety of race cards to enrich her position when it sees fit. I struggle to see how the same handlers that managed Biden aren't the same ones that have been handling Harris and will continue to do so

There's no doubt she uses it as well, I just see it being more prevalent from Trump.