Do we know for a fact that the government is not funding this type of research? Got a source?
Yeah. You can search everything the government is funding, you won't find anything related to pre-existing immunity. You can start here:
While I agree that the vaccine does not reduce viral load, vaccines are not always intended to completely prevent infection
We've already been through this once already. Either you want to believe the science or you don't. I don't care.
All these adverse vaccine reactions are a nothing-sandwich when compared to the risks of the disease itself.
Risk of the virus for whom? What group are you referring to? If you're elderly or compromised, yes get the vaccine. However, for everyone else the risk of the vaccine may not outweigh the reward. It depends.
As for the myocarditis point, studies show that vaccines cause a 3-fold risk of myocarditis, but actually catching the disease causes an 18-fold risk.
Your 18 fold isn't entirely accurate. Regardless, I said your risk increases each time your body is exposed to the spike protein. So sure, it's 3-fold after 2 doses. But, where is it at after 4 shots? 6-fold increase? What about when you have to boost again next year... The safety profile of the vaccine changes/diminishes the more it's used. So yes, it absolutely makes sense to start weighing the risk vs reward based on a person's medical profile, as opposed to mandating it for any and everyone. I've never said the vaccine shouldn't be used at all. All I'm saying is that the data clearly indicates that we require a more nuanced approach to its administration.