Sorry, I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I couldn't wade through 3600 plus pages. Isn't the scientific method about trying to prove a hypothesis wrong in the search for truth? So, for all the pro-vaccine people saying that the anti-vaccine people are dumb or whatever, aren't they (the anti-vaccine people) contributing by questioning the validity of a vaccine? In other words, everyone, regardless of stance on the vaccine, should be able to at least agree that it is natural, logical, and valid to question a vaccine, especially when it is being used as a political mechanism to divide the public for dubious agendas (by both sides).