While I appreciate your efforts to help the OP, this claim is full of half-truths and outright false statements.
In autocross, you don't want to decrease grip anywhere if you don't have to.
I know why you say to get a RSB, and some of it is MK7 fanboy love of the RSB being the best first mod, and some of it is stock autocrossing restrictions from days bygone when you could only modify the rear bar.
The truth is, the OEM rear bar is enough to lift the rear tire in a corner, especially with good 200tw tires. A larger rear bar just lifts that tire higher and imposes a greater crushing load on the outside front tire, INCREASING understeer. That front tire already does not have enough negative camber to deal with the normal load of the OEM bar and a bad (safe) OEM alignment.
What is needed, as you eventually point out, is less body roll to reduce camber loss.
So if this is true, why did you recommend a bigger rear bar?
The truth is I don't think you know better, and that's okay as it's never too late to learn new things.
What (G-street) autocrossers should be doing is getting a mild FSB, and using the rear toe as a tool for getting the car to "rotate", not "decreasing grip" to achieve rotation.
I'm in the Street Touring (STH) class and I have both bars and springs AND rear toe out for rotation. You would be amazed how well the car handles slaloms, sweepers, and tight corners.