if 1,000 people got the vaccineProblems =/= deaths you imbecile. The reason that they say problems are under reported is because people dont bother to report fucking sniffles or a sore arm. (your biggest fear)
Also that is how numbers work hombre, go back to math class maybe.
0.01/0.01 = 100% (1)
Keep telling yourself that. 'Experts' are not concerned about sore arms, everyone gets those OBVIOUSLY.Problems =/= deaths you imbecile. The reason that they say problems are under reported is because people dont bother to report fucking sniffles or a sore arm. (your biggest fear)
Also that is how numbers work hombre, go back to math class maybe.
0.01/0.01 = 100% (1)
Here's a 12 year old that was in the clinical trial. It's heartbreaking. Monsters like you refuse to admit the vaccine can harm, so they tried to label her as having mental illness. These are the people that speak up, and you so callously make fun of.
9 visits to the ER, 3 admissions, and doctors 'won't help her.'
https://www.jsonline.com/picture-ga...-news-conference-covid-19-vaccine/7788425002/
Sen. Ron Johnson holds news conference on possible side effects from COVID-19 vaccine
if 1,000 people got covid 19
and 1% of them died, that would be 10 deaths
and if only 1% of those 10 deaths were reported
that would mean 1 death was reported
you're missing the context. there's nothing to fix.Ftfy
you're missing the context. there's nothing to fix.
i was never arguing that vaccine deaths outweigh covid deaths. i was simply explaining to him his math was wrong (while being kind enough to ignore his petty insult)No, I fixed it. Covid deaths are absolutely undercounted.
Vaccine deaths are rare.
You're just wrong.
lol i already fixed it. i forgot the '.'1% of 10 is .1
Equally important is the "would be". Not even the authors of the report believe it.At least post the full context. The article even specifies that...
"The report in Pittsburgh would be the first known case of blood clotting linked to a vaccine based on messenger RNA"
"While a number of recipients of the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson shots have developed clotting, including some fatal cases, those vaccines use different technology and are instead based on a deactivated adenovirus."
Like, is it physically impossible for you to not misrepresent data and information to fit your agenda? The problem with you, and everybody like you, is that any actual points you may have in an argument get automatically disregarded because you can't help but misconstrue every single little piece of information.
This. People have adverse reactions to all sorts of things - including water, so having an adverse reaction to a vaccine isn't a stretch of the imagination - but - the vast majority of people that should get the vaccine are perfectly fine.I don't disregard the stories of people who have had bad reactions to the vaccine. To them the vaccine was dangerous.
That being said...
The people uninjured by the vaccine are the ocean. People injured by it are singular drops of rain.
i was never arguing that vaccine deaths outweigh covid deaths. i was simply explaining to him his math was wrong (while being kind enough to ignore his petty insult)
instead of trying to make arguments out of everything, and doxing internet strangers, why don't you grow the fuck up. you're sure as hell old enough to know better by now