GOLFMK8
GOLFMK7
GOLFMK6
GOLFMKV

The COVID19 SCAMdemic... California Nears $8 Gallon Gas - Biden Sends Zelenskyyy $61 Billion

zrickety

zrickety

The Fixer
FOLLOW THE MONEY.

NOAA says this summer was as hot as 1936 'dust bowl.'
So the weather today is the same as 85 years ago??? OMG, THE CRISIS.
LOL #ClimateHoax
 
torga

torga

Autocross Champion
anotero said:
Anthropomorphic means having human characteristics, resembling humans. The appropriate term is anthropogenic.
Click to expand...

I had a feeling I was gonna fuck that one up, but I was typing this out rather quickly on my phone walking to the bus stop while typing this out.

Thanks for catching/understanding the intent.
 
cb1111

cb1111

Newbie
“Just pray for me please”: Laura Loomer suffers “brutal” symptoms after hoping she would “get COVID” (msn.com)

A doctor from Oregon who said mask-wearing can lead to carbon monoxide poisoning got his medical license revoked (msn.com)

Delta variant 'will hunt anyone who's not had jab', advisers warn (msn.com)

Anti-vaxx mother and daughter contracted COVID-19 and died 2 weeks apart on the same hospital ward (msn.com)

YouTube couple die of COVID-19 after posting video against vaccines (msn.com)
 
anotero

anotero

Autocross Champion
torga said:
I had a feeling I was gonna fuck that one up, but I was typing this out rather quickly on my phone walking to the bus stop while typing this out.

Thanks for catching/understanding the intent.
Click to expand...

It's been a while since i had to walk to a bus stop. Ah, the big city days.
 
jimlloyd40

jimlloyd40

Autocross Champion
anotero said:
If the capsule can be controlled from Earth, it's not difficult. Now taking a piss, that's an issue.
Click to expand...
And if anything had gone wrong from Earth like a communication problem they wouldn't have had to worry about where they piss. 😂
 
zrickety

zrickety

The Fixer
GTIfan99

GTIfan99

Autocross Champion
npace said:
I've already explained all of this. I never said the Earth isn't warming, so your second quote there only makes you look like the moron. I also never quoted an oil company, so there's that. It's called a straw man, you're posting about something loosely related even though it isn't the argument I'm making. Great logical fallacy. Next time choose someone who can't see through it.

As for the first quote, government funded? Check. Evidence based on ice core samples, that are already problematic for reasons discussed? Check. Does that mean that NASA is wrong? I don't know. But the thing is, neither do you. You're so worried about being right that you can't see the simple fact is that right now, with the information we have, nobody knows for sure. If they did, they wouldn't be going to extremes to continue to collect data to prove themselves correct, would they? Yet ice core sampling is still happening. It's a piece of evidence that may turn out to be correct.

I would also like to know how they collected atmospheric samples before the industrial revolution, which is what allows them to collect those samples now. And finally, I'll let you look up the data on how increased CO2 levels (which is what the NASA article talks about) actually spur increased plant growth, which causes an increase in oxygen production and can lead to a long term cooling effect. The earth wabbles and tilts. It goes through heating and cooling phases. The NASA article demonstrates correlation, for sure.

Finally, I'm not saying that NASA or anyone else is wrong. I'm saying that they don't have definitive proof, which is different than evidence (yes, I did say evidence earlier, my mistake). They are using evidence as proof, while the two can be easily confused, again, I made the mistake earlier. Scientists aren't supposed to act as prosecutors, who have a job to use evidence to convince a courtroom that it equates to proof. That's why it's important to question these things.

Edit: For clarification, I know that nobody said atmospheric samples were collected long ago. The other methods used (ice core samples, tree ring data, carbon samples from the earth) could mean things about the atmosphere, but that data can also be attributed to other factors. Maybe the tree went through a drought in one decade, so the rings got smaller. Maybe there was less sunlight, or more, based on the tilt of the earth. Maybe a heard of mastodon settled in the area and ate all the leaves off of that particular tree. Maybe there has been an increase in CO2. Tons of possibilities, no conclusive proof. See where this is going?
Click to expand...

Nasa says they do have definitive proof, random both sides guy on the internet says they don't.

It's so hard to know who to believe.
 
jimlloyd40

jimlloyd40

Autocross Champion
GTIfan99 said:
Nasa says they do have definitive proof, random both sides guy on the internet says they don't.

It's so hard to know who to believe.
Click to expand...
I've been somewhat of a skeptic about man-made global warming but after seeing the temporary improvement in the atmosphere during the pandemic created by fewer cars on the road, industries closing down etc it's more apparent that man is contributing to global warming. We could be in a normal warming period but it's accelerated by us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top