You absolutely did in fact argue what was written in the least probably close to a dozen times when you repeatedly state that the lease company had no right to get fair market value for the car if sold to a third party.
I never said the lease company has no right to fair market value.
I DID say, ver batim, that the amount owed is the amount explicitly listed in the agreed upon contract as specified by the pre-determined residual value plus any remaining payments on the lease.
Now, I am asking for honest clarity from you here as you are not nearly as articulate as me.
Which do you think the lease contract states, ver batim (or close to);
"The leasor has the right to the fair market value of the car if sold to a third party within X months of lease-end"
OR
"The leasee is obligated to pay the leasor the fair market value of the car if sold to a third party within X months of lease-end"
I am not going to explain the legal differences in the statements until AFTER you respond.