Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd BUMP!
Hey all. Fiance and I had an idea...whether it'll be good or not remains to be seen
We're getting married in Hawaii in september and have been having some issues scheduling a photographer that doesn't make us feel like we're being robbed and that is actually available. It's not some fancy thing, we're just gonna post up on a beach somewhere, my BFF from Jr High is officiating, and only ~10 people are going to be there. On top of that we're not really into the whole wedding photo's thing to begin with, but we realize people will want SOMETHING.
So here's our idea, rather than spend $300-$400 on these photographers, we thought we could just buy a camera ourselves for that money and hand it over to an inclined photographer for most of the photo's, but then also shoot shoot, pass, that way everyone gets to take their wedding photo and we'll let them have it, etc etc the feels d'awww..and then we'll have an actual factual good camera to take photo's with for the trip (we're there for like, eleventybillion days) and I won't have to use my dumbphone camera with the ultrasmartpixalz.
Anyway, I need to know what is a good camera for the price point? I love taking photo's some I'm all over this, a friend let me borrow his DSLR thingy for a trip to DFW Aquarium and I went ham, and have some pretty awesome from the venture! Is it better to spend the whole budget on camera alone, or maybe dial back a bit on camera to get be able to fit in an allowance for different lenses?