First you say it's not actually laminar (why would it be), then you tell me to examine the flow through that screen. Okay, do you want me to set up the grid or you'll do it?
You can set up whatever you like, or come up with a simpler way to explain why the snow is going to stay caked and frozen on that filter in a hot engine bay.
Either way, the cooling result is the same, and the flow directly behind that filter is necessarily coherent. That's where the poor example came from.
I said "effectively" for a
reason, and stated that it was a poor attempt at an example, and then even suggested you could expand on a point. I'm not going to argue. I already conceded.
I just got over Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and I'm having trouble making connections that make sense. Every now and again, I'm going to screw something up.
All I can do is admit when it happens, and I've already done that.