Jim: Most definitely not!! I would NEVER assert that you are telling "porkies". Quite the opposite in fact - I'm certain that you honestly believe that you are correct in your hypothesis.So I guess you think that I'm lying. 70,000 miles of driving with it disconnected from the battery with no problems isn't enough proof for you? My dealer thought I was smart to figure out that it could be simply disconnected.
I have absolutely no problem with anyone holding a firm conviction in their own views- that's their right to do so. It's not my objective to disabuse you of your beliefs - as I said, I'm merely repeating my understanding of the official VW material.
Notwithstanding that your view appears to be at odds with my understanding of the multiple roles of the battery control module - I'm more than happy to entertain the prospect that you have found the "secret key" - well done if this is indeed a viable long-term solution to disable SS - with no side-effects!!
Don
PS: here's an extract from VW's SSP-426 regarding Start/Stop
Battery sensor in battery monitor control unit J367
BlueMotion vehicles with start/stop system
have new wiring to connect the absorbent glass mat
battery including a new battery sensor that is
integrated in the battery monitor control unit.
This control unit is mounted on the minus terminal of
the earth cable and is connected to the diagnosis
interface for data bus via the LIN data bus.
The data obtained allows the charge regulation as
well as the charge voltage to be adapted to the
charge and operating state of the battery.
The SSP goes on to say:
Effect in the event of failure
If the battery sensor is faulty, the operating
condition of the battery can no longer be assessed
correctly.
An entry is made in the fault memory of the data
bus diagnostic interface. The start/stop system is
switched off.
Removing the connector on J367 - simulates a failure in the module with the subsequent effect that "the start/stop system is switched off". So there can be no doubt that SS is disabled - well done!! Incidentally, as also indicated in the extract, a DTC error message is generated in the CAN Gateway module @ address hex19 - because J367 is a LIN slave to this module.
BUT - here's my problem with removing the connector: If J367 is disabled - the SSP clearly identifies that "the condition of the battery can no longer be assessed correctly" (remember, this is a glass mat battery).
And most importantly, if J367 is disabled - how does the bolded bit in the first part of the extract happen? How can the charge regulation/voltage algorithm in the Energy Management facility operate correctly? A rhetorical question, of course - clearly the algorithm can't operate correctly - probably not a big problem in the short term, but not an ideal situation (I suggest) if this solution is used to disable SS in the longer term (again remember, this is a glass mat battery which will be expensive to prematurely replace out-of-warranty).
And finally, incorrect (perhaps "non-optimal" is a better word) charging of the glass mat battery that results from the missing data will have a cumulative effect - IMHO ,"70,000 miles" is not an appropriate metric for judging the real impact of this solution on battery longevity.
So, moral of the story: I can understand if you persist with this solution out of ownership of its discovery! However, please at least consider the stuff above in your resolve to disable SS (which I think is worth doing).
Last edited: