Everyone loves to hate a driver when they're winning, and drivers love to act like cunts if they can get away with it.Lewis, Alonso, ofc Multi 21 Seb, used to all be a lot like Max (Aryton/MSC mentality) but over the years they have calmed down, now relied on their experience instead of going to the absolute limit at all times (including going to the limit of your team/teammate, the track, aggressive passes, the rulebook, etc...)
Ocon was really rough with Alonso last year (not to mention Perez and Stroll during the racing point days) and he was very lenient, probably knows Ocon in the end races for his seat, he doesn't get to command the cocky "Champion" mentality a young WDC winner like Max or Seb in 2010-2013 could... or MSC after freshly winning his Benetton tittles and moving to Ferrari in 1997.
Seb became the sweetheart of the fans and paddock, he use to be a total diva.... Lewis drama peaked after the Rosberg, as there was little need for mind games. The current flop merc is in has humbled him quite a bit, and generally keeps the drama to the min.. I wonder what would happen if the Merc can suddenly fight, Russell could catch him napping and I wonder if he still has the fight in him...
Actually I think Max has already calmed down himself a bit, he was Ocon-like against Sainz in the torro rosso years 2015 when he was racing for his seat, then has been a bit of WDC diva like Seb was but definetly not Multi 21 yet... dont be so quick to judge is my take, he is already doing better than Seb lol
the time penalty should be after the stop is completed instead of before it.
when it comes off the jacks then you do the hold.
It is a lot easier to time. There is (almost) no judgement involved, start when the car stops in the box. Versus, when the car is dropped, but be sure there are no crew members still touching / working on the car. When fractions of seconds matter, I could see teams complaining that the timer didn't start soon enough.I was thinking that, and trying to figure out why the rule is this way in the first place... serving the penalty first..?
Maybe back in the refueling days they where afraid they could serve the penalty while the car still finishes refueling? Or maybe simply bc its easier to time?
LOLhes a cunt.
hes what happens when you've raised a driver entirely on the ayrton senna/michael schumacher "win at all costs" narrative without having the class associated with the others. just look at how he raced against lewis in 2021, all kinds of shit "tricks" that the only way both drivers wouldn't crash is if the other cedes position entirely.
generally you can be upset you didn't win the race but when your teammate is the one who wins and you come P2 you celebrate for a fantastic day for the team, not bitch about not coming in P1.
It is a lot easier to time. There is (almost) no judgement involved, start when the car stops in the box. Versus, when the car is dropped, but be sure there are no crew members still touching / working on the car. When fractions of seconds matter, I could see teams complaining that the timer didn't start soon enough.
you could always do the IMSA thing and actually have a penalty box at the end of the lane where you need to stop and be held.
View attachment 276073
I like that idea. It avoids the problems mentioned that the teams would complain about the timer after dropping the car.
Also, they need to enforce a time limit on the stewards. The question of his serving his penalty did NOT happen on the last lap, or even the last 5 laps. There is NO reason why it should not have been decided until after the race. Nothing says the rules are too complex and inconsistent than needing 30 minutes to decide if someone broke them.
5 minutes. If you can't figure it out then that rule is stupid complex and should be removed. If an incident occurs on the last lap, you hold the awards for 5 minutes while they sort it out then go. Enough of this "will review after the race" garbage unless it's a penalty that won't affect the results (like a team penalty, etc).
Happy birthday to one of the best.