utekineir
Banned
I wrote a paper on this for a sociology class once.
Basically what it boiled down to was that the roots of men paying for everything made sense and was perfectly acceptable back a hundred plus years ago when women did not work and were not expected to work. (Remember the term working girls = hookers)
In todays society with "equal rights" women work and atleast as far as teen to early 20s jobs make as much as their male equivalent if not more (waitresses).
After establishing that I went on to conclude that if both sexes work, have equal rights, and make a comparable amount of money. Is 16 year old jimmy that spends over a days pay at $6 an hour not justified in looking for a little something something if he takes a girl out and all she has to do is look nice?
Basically "equal rights" equals paying half, or put out. It was just phrased academically over several pages.
Ironically the feminist bleeding heart teachers assistant that graded it gave me a D, focusing entirely on content, not the fact that it was well written, argued and met the criteria of the assignment.
imo
gold diggers = fuck and forget
Basically what it boiled down to was that the roots of men paying for everything made sense and was perfectly acceptable back a hundred plus years ago when women did not work and were not expected to work. (Remember the term working girls = hookers)
In todays society with "equal rights" women work and atleast as far as teen to early 20s jobs make as much as their male equivalent if not more (waitresses).
After establishing that I went on to conclude that if both sexes work, have equal rights, and make a comparable amount of money. Is 16 year old jimmy that spends over a days pay at $6 an hour not justified in looking for a little something something if he takes a girl out and all she has to do is look nice?
Basically "equal rights" equals paying half, or put out. It was just phrased academically over several pages.
Ironically the feminist bleeding heart teachers assistant that graded it gave me a D, focusing entirely on content, not the fact that it was well written, argued and met the criteria of the assignment.
imo
gold diggers = fuck and forget